#Media / #News / #Scholarship / #Inquiries / #UB
SHEEHAN & TANTER: Six Reasons Congress Should Reject the Iran Nuclear Deal | Townhall | Policy Commentary | Print #PDF
Dr. Ivan Sascha Sheehan, Associate Professor of Public and International Affairs, is joined by former National Security Council Senior Staff member and Emeritus Professor Dr. Raymond Tanter at Townhall on why Congress should be concerned with the porous nature of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran.
The policy-oriented commentary extends remarks they delivered at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.


Also Read — SHEEHAN: Reject the Nuclear Deal in Favor of Regime Change from Within | The Hill
Prof. Ivan Sascha Sheehan, Associate Professor of Public and International Affairs at the University of Baltimore, directs graduate programs in Negotiations and Conflict Management/ Global Affairs and Human Security. The author of several critiques of preemptive force, Sheehan writes and speaks on matters pertinent to congressional oversight of the Iran deal, including regime change from within, and the main Iranian opposition to a nuclear-armed Iran.
Emeritus Prof. Raymond Tanter, University of Michigan, is President of Iran Policy Committee Publishing and former member of the National Security Council staff and Representative of the Secretary of Defense to arms control talks. Tanter writings include Arab Rebels and Iranian Dissidents, Iran’s Breakout and Sneakout, and Appeasing the Ayatollahs and Suppressing Democracy.
For additional research or media related updates or to learn more about Dr. Sheehan, follow him on Twitter @ProfSheehan or link to his research profiles.
Follow Dr. Tanter @IPCPublishing and Pundicity.
/ #About / #News / #Scholarship /
38.907192
-77.036871
Dupont Circle, Washington, DC, USA
Like this:
Like Loading...
This entry was posted on August 5, 2015 at 4:13 PM and is filed under analysis, arak, assad, baghdad, ballistic missiles, bipartisan, CIA, congress, congressional oversight, counterterrorism, covert, debate, democracy, democrat, deterrence, diplomacy, dissident, Dr. Ivan Sascha Sheehan, education, fordow, foreign policy, foreign policy analysis, freedom, fundamentalism, global, haider al-abadi, House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Terrorism and Non-Proliferation, human rights, human security, IAEA, inspections, intelligence, international relations, international security studies, iran, iran policy committee, iraq, irgc, ISIS, israel, Ivan Sascha Sheehan, kerry, leadership, media, middle east, militarization, military, natanz, national press club, NCRI, negotiation, netanyahu, nuclear, obama, P5+1, parchin, paris, PMOI, policy, politics, preemptive, prof. alan kuperman, prof. raymond tanter, Professor Ivan Sascha Sheehan, protest, regime change, regime change from within, republican, research, rouhani, sanctions, scholarly, securitization, security studies, senate, senate foreign relations committee, sheehan, shiite, state department, sunni, syria, tanter, teaching, tehran, terror tagging, terrorism, threat, u.s. foundation for liberty, unrest, war, warships, weapons, white house, yemen, zarif with tags @ProfSheehan, @PublicAffairsUB, College of Public Affairs, Congress, Counterterrorism, Dr. Ivan Sascha Sheehan, Global Affairs and Human Security Graduate Program, Iran, Iraq, ISIS, israel, Ivan Sascha Sheehan, Middle East, NCRI, Negotiation and Conflict Management Graduate Program, nuclear deal, Policy, Professor Ivan Sascha Sheehan, Regime Change, School of Public and International Affairs, Tanter, Terrorism, White House. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply